Google releases ‘Google Plus One’ button

August 17, 2011 | Category : Category,Google Search Engine,Search Engine | Tags:

By Matthew Kinlin


Google has recently released a new social tool called ‘Google Plus One’.

 

The tab is presented as a ‘+1’ button and works in a very similar way to the Facebook ‘Like’ button. In the words of Google, the button is a way of saying: ‘you should check this out’ to other people.

 

By clicking the ‘+1’ button, you give your recommendation to a web page. There is an option to keep the your ‘+1’ recommendations as a private record of your web highlights, or you can have them as public and recommend pages to your friends and the rest of the internet.

 

However unlike Facebook, the Google ‘+1’ tab has one vital additional app: Google-enabled search.

 

Google has placed the ‘+1’ button in two places: on the Google search listings next to each search result and at the top of individual web pages. Content providers have been encouraged by Google to add the ‘+1’ option to their web pages.

 

To use the tool, the user is required to have a Google account. Once the user is logged into their account, the ‘+1’ options for search results and web pages will be made visible.

 

It seems likely that Google will collate feedback to sort out good content from bad. Social data will probably be used to indicate popular, useful sources of data and these will be integrated with Google search.

 

In other words, they rise straight to the top of Google’s search page.

Comments Off

Smaller search platforms attract traffic too

By Jackie Yeadon
 
Search engines going after some of Google’s share were successful in May, according to figures from Experian Hitwise.

Its recent Search Engine and Social Analysis showed that Google and Yahoo! both lost market share in terms of searches in May 2011, while Bing, Ask and others made “significant gains”.

Comments Off

Adrac search penalty specialist briefs City fund managers

Last week, one of Adrac Ltd’s search engine specialists took part in a City business event to help raise awareness about the potentially crippling effects of search engine penalties.

Natural search expert Tariq Ahmed was among other professionals speaking to an audience of fund managers, analysts and representatives of the financial media at the seminar.

The idea behind the event was to offer insight into search penalty consequences and explain how they can affect investments in smaller quoted companies.

Tariq – who sometimes contributes to this blog – detailed how search engine bans had impacted upon businesses, using real examples of accidental and intentional penalties levied on companies.

“It’s concerning that some penalties seem to be accidental but there is no process to have them removed. Also, if a company website has done something wrong unintentionally, there’s no advice on how to put it right,” he said.

“Frustration at bureaucracy is just the tip of the iceberg: search engines have immense power and influence, and a penalty can seriously impact on a business on many levels.”

The event was organised by One News Page, which is behind the Have I Been Penalized campaign for search engine transparency, which in turn is supported by Icomp (Initiative for a Competitive Online Market Place).

Event host Ray Snoddy, former Financial Times and Times journalist and BBC NewsWatch presenter, wrote on www.mediatel.co.uk after the seminar:

“The campaigners concede that many of the Google criteria are fair and necessary to provide an even playing field for the ever-increasing number of companies doing business online.

“In particular it is entirely reasonable to prevent anyone obtaining unfair advantage online through unacceptable search optimisation techniques.”

Other speakers included: Timothy R.W. Cowen, an expert on EU and UK competition law from Sidley Austin LLP; Bob Sakayama, an expert on search penalties and penalty handling from TNG/Earthling Inc (New York); and Dr Marc Pinter-Krainer, founder of One News Page.

Recent research by One News Page found that 90% of the 40 analysts it polled want more transparency over search penalties; some 60% said they were not aware that search engines could impose them without having to inform the affected websites and only 25% knew penalties could remain in place for up to three years.

Businesses who think they have been hit by a search engine ban should enlist the help of optimisation experts. In some cases, righting wrongs – like getting rid of black hat SEO on a website or ceasing a rule infraction – can lead to a penalty being lifted sooner rather than later.

However, Adrac suggests having a website health check before a ban occurs.

Comments Off

Part 2: Google is the sheriff! White Hat, ethical SEO, is the law of the virtual plains

In the last post Adrac took a light hearted look at the White Hat, Black Hat symbolism used in search engine optimisation.

Moving on into more serious territory now, Google has made it a mission to raise quality on the internet. It ranks websites on its search engine results page according to its quality standards, taking into consideration things like relevance, banning the use of doorway tactics and devaluing sites that use poor content, spam keywords and, more recently, download times.

However, following Google’s infamous downgrading of retailer JC Penney’s website for link farming,  US company BrightEdge released results of an audit of the websites of more than 1,000 leading brands that revealed black hat SEO tactics “are much more widespread than most are aware” – especially company directors.

How to spot a White Hat SEO company

They will:

  • - assess your current market and search engine results page position
  • - undertake a competitor analysis
  • - discuss openly with you what actions they recommend
  • - agree on your budget before work commences
  • - be unlikely to want to tie you in for lengthy contracts
  • - provide unique, keyworded content for your website and your publicity and marketing materials
  • - have substantial, proven experience as an established company with an impressive client base
  • - provide monthly reports
  • - wear White Hats (joke!)


Since the Panda/Farmer update to Google’s algorithm, which aimed to address the growing problem of high ranking spam content and bad SEO practices, many other companies may have found their Serp position affected. With White Hat SEO, this will not happen; so, if your website has experienced a sudden landslide then there are questions you need to ask about the provision of your SEO services.

Comments Off

Part 1: Black hat, bad cowboy – white hat, ethical SEO is the Lone Ranger of the new frontier

Here’s a sideways, fun look at White Hat and Black Hat symbolism, as used in the world of search engine optimisation and Hollywood B-Movie Westerns.

Jargon works in two ways: to help give a group an identity, make them special, separate them from the masses via use of language; and as a legitimate tool to explain economically what something means, especially something new. Sometimes it is not clear how terms originate or who first coined particular phrases before they become part of subculture, culture and industry.

Take the terms White Hat and Black Hat, for example. There are several meanings that can be derived from the terms but they all lead back to the same place: cowboys and the wild frontier.

A frontier is the edge of populated land, where the known, the safe and the familiar meet the strange, frightening and lawless. In such lands, where anything can happen, it helps to have very simple indicators to help you know who to trust and who makes you dig your spurs into your horse’s flanks and giddy-on-up in the opposite direction.

Culture, as ever, draws upon what it already knows, and films (movies) have influenced language with its symbolism, just as oil paintings and theatre had done before. In the West, certainly, it is tradition in films that the guy wearing a white hat is a goodie, while the one in the black hat is a villainous troublemaker intent on getting what he wants by any means.

Hence we have the modern origins of White Hat and Black Hat descriptions of SEO practices, rooted in popular culture B-Movie Westerns from the early part of the 20th century. But unlike the Lone Ranger, who always fought the bad guys in black hats and won, White Hat SEOs are not policing the nefarious practices of the Black Hat SEOs, they are forging ahead into the unknown and exciting realms of world wide web alongside them, gaining ground using only ethical means.

It’s a common theme in Westerns that the good guy has to struggle harder to get the girl, save the town, find the treasure, build the church, provide for his family, while the bad guy seems to effortlessly get what he wants, no matter who or what stands in his way. Bad guys are poison for these new communities struggling to thrive in the frontier lands, stealing money and cattle, killing the men folk, harassing the womenfolk, disrespecting law and order. Sometimes they have small – and dramatic – wins; but the white hats prevail at the end of the film.

Parallels can be drawn with White Hat SEO: ethical practices are sustainable in the long term, bolster good company reputations and have a long term positive impact on profits; they also raise the quality benchmark of the entire community. Conversely, Black Hats pollute the user experience, degrade reputations and, while clients might experience brief spikes in profit, these cannot be sustained.

Black and white is how we like to see things. In reality, we know that, aside from Mother Theresa, the Dalai Lama and possibly Nelson Mandela, most of us probably fall into a shades-of-grey-hat area. But black and white is how we best understand things, and when it comes to SEO then good and bad have been categorically defined – by Google.

Coming next – Part 2: Google is the sheriff!

Comments Off

Considering the rules and guidance for Google AdWords

SearchEngineLand, in a post that appeared last week, lists four main ways of falling foul of Google AdWords’ rules:

• Using multiple accounts for one business
• Masquerading as someone else to attract traffic
• Selling free items
• Distributing malware/infecting searchers’ PCs

At least three of these might be obvious, but Adrac Ltd reckons that using multiple accounts might be one rather innocent way to get a suspension or ban from using Google’s paid advertising platform.

Google’s standards for AdWords are quite high, and rightly so. Sometimes the accessibility of the internet and its magic makes people want to rush in and get started and forget to proof read or even read the content guidelines.

If you are considering handling your paid search advertising (pay per click or PPC) yourself, or even if you want to understand a little about what your account manager is doing on your behalf, read on. But we also recommend you read Google’s rules, too. Not only is it interesting, giving insight into the wider world of natural search, it could stop a shed load of trouble.

Here are some of the stipulations laid down in Google’s guidance for AdWords – a shortlist by Adrac of the ones people could accidentally, or purposefully, fall foul of.

And in here somewhere is the formula for the perfect AdWords text. Honestly!

• Spelling: must be correct, though common abbreviations or spellings such as ‘tonite’ or ‘pix’ are permitted. stifles a wince
• Adverts and keywords must be relevant to your landing page.
• Language: no profanity, plus Google prohibits call-to-action phrases like ‘click here’.
• Prices: must be accurate and easily found within one or two clicks of the landing page.
• Warranty: if mentioned, any limitations should be included in the advert.
• Some examples of what is specifically banned from AdWords: escort agencies, anti-abortion promotion, herbal drugs, fireworks, some mobile content, travel aggregation websites, selling items or services available free elsewhere, the selling of items breaching copyright, online pharmacies, websites that are unclear about their billing practices.
• Take care with your landing page. Error messages, incorrectly displayed links, locking users into the landing page, using a landing page with the sole purpose of driving traffic on to another webpage, use of popups and poor server security are no-nos. Consult Google’s WebMaster advice. Landing page relevance is vital.

So, while you might not be able to imagine your reputable business falling foul of the ‘no phishing’ or ‘no malware’ rules, it’s conceivable that your AdWords account could be suspended or terminated because you missed something really simple.

AdWords is a fabulous tool and, despite all these rules and regulations, relatively easy to learn. However, Adrac recommends using paid search management for AdWords (and other PPC providers like Bing, Facebook and so on) because this places your budget into the safe hands of business development managers, and the profits into your business bank account.

Comments Off

Ethical SEO prevents the helter-skelter effect!

Ethical (white hat) SEO is essential for high rank-ability for the long term.

Since Google updated its algorithm to combat the increasing amount of high ranking spam content on search engine results pages (SERPs), we have taken note of the news reports of some companies slip-sliding down the rankings.

None of Adrac’s clients have lost SERP positions. We accredit this to the quality of our search engine optimisation, which aims to be sustainable and supportive, and continues to prove itself so.

Comments Off

Adrac on Google Instant: bandwidth issues, search redundancy, errors

Google Instant (also dubbed Google streaming by internet junkies) is the new update for the world’s most popular search engine.

Adrac experimented with the results when it was rolled out in the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Russia. It’s available to people who used the following browsers: Chrome v5/6, Firefox v3, Safari v5 for Mac and Internet Explorer v8.

However, users on domains other than Google.com could only access Google Instant if they are signed in to a Google Account.
Our first reaction was “why?” – we believe in improvement and innovation and still, we find it hard to understand the benefits for having this delivery of results.

First: bandwidth. We question the need for results being delivered if not needed. Will this not eat away at bandwidth, in effect costing the user a percentage of their download allocation? When you consider how many people search on Google every day (in fact every nanosecond), how environmentally friendly will this search delivery be?
Google has created a drain on resources for no genuine benefits to the end user.
The best way to represent this here is:
Old way

Load Google> type term> car> press return> search> result delivered

New way

Load Google> type term> c> search initiated> result delivered> a> search> result delivered> r> search> result delivered

For those of us lacking the ability to spell or type, add a whole lot of deletions and mis-searches into the mix and the redundancy increases.

So, again, we ask “why?”

Comments Off

Search Engine is History in the Making

A search engine which collects historical data is being created to help researchers find useful sources. The Connected History Project will allow academics and members of the public to find resources in one place, since it will link up to currently separated databases of source materials.

The search engine will eventually index newspapers, maps, digitised books, manuscripts, genealogical records and images from 1500-1900. Professor Robert Shoemaker from the University of Sheffield, who is leading the project, hopes it will allow users to find electronic resources created separately by universities and commercial providers, all in one place.

Twelve institutions have so far signed up to contribute their materials to the collection and more are expected to follow suit. Completion for the project has been scheduled for March 2011.

Comments Off

Yahoo! and Microsoft join forces to create powerful search

Yahoo! and Microsoft have been granted permission to shake up the search market and have teamed up to create a ‘competitive choice in search for advertisers and consumers.’

The initiative has been created to improve the search user experience by speeding the search process up and making the service much easier to use according to the Yahoo! Search Blog.

So what’s changing? It would appear from initial comments that Microsoft will now provide the basic search listings and ads for Yahoo! users, while Yahoo! continues to enhance search results listings.

Perhaps the most interesting observation coming from this is the rumour that Microsoft AdCenter will form the backbone of the new combined entity, as the advertising interface for Yahoo! and its partners. Microsoft AdCenter has only been around for a couple of years and is relatively new in comparison with the former technology used to power advertising on Yahoo! which has existed for over a decade.

The Yahoo! and Microsoft Search Alliance will utilise the combined audience of nearly 577 million, which is obviously appealing to advertisers. Not to worry though, the transition is said to be as seamless as possible and will not be taking place until late 2010/early 2011.

More information can be found on the Search Alliance website.

Comments Off

Twitter Updates